JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 24, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Alvaro Pulido Rueda Vs. Hi Tech Zipp Corp Colombia S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Diecisiete Civil Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bogota, Sala Laboral. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Diecisiete Civil Del Circuito De Bogota
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Principio Perpetuatio Jurisdictionis
  • No se puede trasladar conocimiento de tutela en razón del cambio de naturaleza de entidades demandadas por afectar derechos fundamentales
Acción De Tutela
  • Decreto 1382 de 2000 no establece competencia sino reglas de simple reparto
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Dejar sin efecto el Auto del veinte (20) de octubre de 2006, proferido por el Juzgado Diecisiete Civil del Circuito de Bogota, dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Alvaro Pulido Rueda.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, se REMITA al Juzgado Diecisiete Civil del Circuito de Bogota, el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por el senor Alvaro Pulido Rueda contra la Compania Hi Tech Zipp Corp. Colombia S.A para que tramite la segunda instancia.
  3. TERCERO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota, Sala de Decision Laboral, lo resuelto en esta providencia con el fin de ponerle en conocimiento los fundamentos constitucionales y legales en virtud de los cuales se adopta la presente decision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.